Log in | Register | Sarcasm Society
The Sarcasmistblog.sarcasmsociety.comSarcasm SocietySarcasmSociety.comSarcastic SageAn "Advice Column"Sarcastic SinewsSarcasm Society WebcomicSarcastic QuotesCollection of Quotations

Warren’s tax opinion piece keeps on ticking

Written by The Sarcasmist on August 24, 2011 - Comments (8)

As those who follow politics and business news (from what I understand, that’s at least 99% of the U.S. population, even infants) must have read or heard, Warren Buffett suggested, in an opinion piece, last week in the New York Times, that the federal government should raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans, himself included.

“My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress,” he said. “It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.”

Now everyone is in a tizzy trying to figure out what to make of this argument by one of the richest men in the World. After keeping silent for an entire week (since the article was published), I’ve decided to put an end to all the confusion.

There are two real possibilities which may have caused Mr. Buffett to make what seems a ridiculous suggestion from a man who stands to lose money if his recommendation is implemented. First, Mr. Buffett has, in his old age, succumbed to dementia and is babbling nonsense. Second, his accountants and advisors have figured out a way for his company to benefit from a tax hike on the rich. Perhaps a new tax on the rich would fill the government’s coffers to a point where a second round of ‘stimulus’ spending can be implemented. As all you politically and financially savvy readers know, most of the last round of stimulus went to big financial institutions. As I’m sure most, if not all, of you have picked up on the subtle genius of this plan, I’ll just leave the explanation at that, and let you discuss things amongst yourselves.

Comments

  1. My theory is that when a rich guy gets close to dying, they say things that leave everyone po’d after they die..

  2. Yea, but…he just might have been serious on what he said also. I guess you don’t want to accept that , though.

    • I think that either he’s one very decent man, or he’s just playing mind games with poor, dear, devoted congress, for a joke.

    • The only reason he said this is because he knows most billionaires (the very rich) don’t have any income. Higher income taxes would therefore only hit the working rich, people who most likely still have to work hard to get where they are.

  3. nightingale801

    Huh I felt so intelligent that I didn’t even feel the need to use my brain while reading. Wow, good one:D

  4. Government is too obese already to be given more food (money). Time to diet!

  5. Wm Brian MacLean

    There’s something stupid people forget – you are not taxed on all the money you have, but only on the money you earn in a year. Under Eisenhower, the tax rate on the richest folks was 91%. And that 9% kept was STILL great big buckets of money. Modern rich people (except Buffett) are effing crybabies.

Leave a Reply

Please keep it clean. There really is no need for profanity. I am sure you can get your point across without resorting to cursing.
Please configure your widgets.
More in Uncategorized (1 of 3 articles)


In another tale of “How the $&@* are they getting away with this?  Oh, that’s right:  We let them through ...